⚠️ September 17, 2025

Policy & Law Update

What Changed in 2025 — And What Didn't

On September 17, 2025, HUD withdrew its FHEO-2020-01 guidance on emotional support animals. Landlords began claiming the rules changed. Here is what the law actually says.

The Timeline
January 28, 2020

HUD Issues FHEO-2020-01 Guidance

HUD published detailed guidance clarifying how housing providers should process ESA accommodation requests under the Fair Housing Act — including acceptable documentation, the interactive process, and the prohibition on ESA-specific fees.

September 17, 2025

HUD Withdraws FHEO-2020-01

HUD issued a notice withdrawing the 2020 guidance document. The withdrawal was administrative — it removed HUD's interpretive guidance but did not amend or repeal any provision of the Fair Housing Act itself, which is a federal statute requiring an act of Congress to change.

September 17, 2025 — Present

The Statute Remains In Effect. Courts Continue to Enforce.

42 U.S.C. § 3604 has not been amended. Courts applying FHA precedent continue to hold that disability-based refusals and fee impositions on ESA tenants may constitute discriminatory housing practices. No court has held that the withdrawal of FHEO-2020-01 extinguishes tenant rights under the FHA statute.

What Was Withdrawn — And What Wasn't

The Guidance vs. The Law

Understanding the difference between administrative guidance and federal statute is essential to understanding what September 17, 2025 actually means.

Administrative guidance is a document issued by a federal agency explaining how it interprets and intends to enforce a statute. It has persuasive authority but is not itself law. An agency can issue or withdraw guidance without any act of Congress.

Federal statute — like the Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 3601–3619 — is enacted by Congress and signed by the President. It can only be amended or repealed by Congress. HUD cannot repeal or amend the Fair Housing Act by issuing a withdrawal notice.

What Was Withdrawn

  • FHEO-2020-01 guidance document (HUD's interpretive memo)
  • HUD's specific guidance on what documentation is "reasonable" to request
  • HUD's guidance framing on fee prohibitions for ESAs
  • HUD enforcement policy priorities reflecting 2020 guidance

What Was NOT Changed

  • 42 U.S.C. § 3604 — the Fair Housing Act statute
  • 24 C.F.R. Part 100 — HUD's implementing regulations
  • The obligation to provide reasonable accommodations for disability
  • The private right of action for tenants (42 U.S.C. § 3613)
  • Existing court precedent applying the FHA to ESA cases
  • State fair housing laws that mirror or exceed federal protections
The Statute Still Says
"It shall be unlawful… to discriminate in the sale or rental, or to otherwise make unavailable or deny, a dwelling to any buyer or renter because of a handicap… [and to] refuse to make reasonable accommodations in rules, policies, practices, or services, when such accommodations may be necessary to afford such person equal opportunity to use and enjoy a dwelling."
42 U.S.C. § 3604(f)(1) and (f)(3)(B) — Fair Housing Act (unchanged as of 2026)
What Landlords Are Claiming vs. What Courts Enforce

What Some Landlords Now Claim

  • "The ESA rules were removed — we can charge pet fees again"
  • "HUD guidance is gone so there's no standard anymore"
  • "We can require third-party ESA verification services"
  • "There's no prohibition on ESA fees now"
  • "You need to use our screening service to validate your ESA"

What Courts Have Found

  • Courts have found that charging pet fees for ESAs may violate 42 U.S.C. § 3604
  • Requiring paid third-party ESA registration has been found to constitute disability discrimination
  • The FHA reasonable accommodation standard continues to apply regardless of guidance status
  • Punitive damages are available for willful violations under § 3613
  • State courts apply parallel state fair housing statutes in many cases
Psychiatric Service Dogs — The Stronger Play in 2026

🐾 The Psychiatric Service Dog (PSD) Dual-Track Strategy

For tenants whose animal is trained to perform specific tasks related to a psychiatric disability, the post-2025 landscape makes the Psychiatric Service Dog dual-track a stronger position than ESA alone.

What is it? A PSD is a service animal under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), Title III (public accommodations) and Title II (public entities), as well as under the Fair Housing Act. Unlike ESAs, PSDs under the ADA do not require documentation. Under the FHA, a PSD carries dual protection: both as an ADA service animal and as a reasonable accommodation under § 3604.

Why it matters post-2025: The ADA's service animal protections were not affected by HUD's September 2025 guidance withdrawal. A tenant with a trained PSD can invoke both the ADA and the FHA simultaneously, creating dual enforcement pathways and potentially strengthening claims against housing providers who impose fees or denial.

Key distinction: For a PSD to qualify under the ADA, the animal must be individually trained to perform a specific task that mitigates the handler's disability (e.g., interrupting self-harm behaviors, waking a handler from nightmares). "Presence and comfort" alone does not satisfy the ADA's task-trained standard. Consult a disability rights attorney to evaluate whether your animal qualifies.

Practical Impact for Tenants Today

What This Means If You Are Facing a Denial or Fee

The withdrawal of FHEO-2020-01 does not mean your rights are gone. It means the landscape is more contested — and documentation matters more than ever.

If you are being charged an ESA fee: Courts have repeatedly found that such fees in connection with disability accommodations may violate 42 U.S.C. § 3604. The withdrawal of guidance does not eliminate the statutory prohibition. Keep documentation of all fee demands.

If your ESA accommodation is being denied: The FHA reasonable accommodation obligation under § 3604(f)(3)(B) remains in effect. A housing provider must engage in an individualized, interactive process. A blanket denial without a legally sufficient basis may constitute a discriminatory housing practice under courts' interpretation of the statute.

What you should document now: All written communications from your landlord, any fee receipts or demands, your healthcare provider's documentation, and dates of all relevant interactions. This documentation is critical for any HUD complaint or private action.

Take Action
📄

Use Our Letter Template

Send a formal demand letter with statutory citations and a 10-day response deadline.

Get the Template →
📊

Report a Post-2025 Fee

Help document the pattern of fees charged since September 2025. Your information is confidential.

Share Your Experience →
⚖️

Class Action Context

Systematic fee charging by large property managers may create class exposure. Learn what to document.

Learn More →

⚠️ Educational information only. Nothing on this page constitutes legal advice or creates an attorney-client relationship. Legal protections vary by state and circumstance. Consult a licensed fair housing attorney for advice specific to your situation. References to what "courts have found" are based on publicly available federal case information and do not guarantee any particular outcome in any individual case.

MORE ESA RIGHTS RESOURCES

📋 Know Your ESA Rights ⚖️ What Changed in 2025 ✉️ Send Demand Letter ⚡ Class Action Rights 🚨 Report a Violation 🗺️ State ESA Laws